10th Forum Conference Report:
Sectoral Group Reports


The working core of the conference was the three daily meetings of people who are involved in the same sector in the three countries, whether they represent a government agency, mass organization, local NGO, professional association, foundation, university, multilateral development agency, bilateral donor, business or international NGO. Sectoral meetings offered an opportunity for participants to profit from each other's experience, develop means of ongoing communication and consider cooperative projects and exchanges. Twenty sectoral groups met during the course of the Forum.

Index
Agriculture, Fisheries and Irrigation
HIV/AIDS/STD
Community Development - Rural
Community Development - Urban
Disaster Preparedness & relief
Education: Preschool and Primary
Education: Secondary, Vocational
Education: University, Graduate Work, Research, Exchange
Environment, Ecology Restoration
Health: Primary Health Care and Reproductive Health
Labor, Working Conditions
Land: Pressures of Population and Legal Issues
Legacies: Landmines, UXO and Agent Orange
Micro-credit, Economic Development
Nutrition and Child Survival
Private Investment, Trade and Tourism
Process of Developing Funding
Services for and with People with Disabilities
Social and Economic Development in Remote Areas
Trafficking in Women and Children
Women's Organizations

Conference reports by Amanda B. Hickman.

 

Agriculture, Fisheries and Irrigation

top

1. Transferring technologies to farmer, strengthening the farmer movement

The group discovered that there are some main points that need to be done for transfer of technologies to farmers and strengthening the farmer movement. They are:

  1. selection the target area,
  2. field study,
  3. selection of target people,
  4. people participatory for find their needs and way of implement,
  5. training/visiting,
  6. pilot project
  7. sustainable ways of using natural resources and reproduce of seeds for our needs such as managing slope area and reproduce crop’s seeds and expand activities including self produce of seeds for use.
  8. extension work
  9. irrigation management
  10. fisheries and livestock

How to transfer technologies

  1. field studies
  2. participation approach
  3. training on the job
  4. pilot project

What kind of techniques we supply to the farmers

  1. appropriate and simple techniques
  2. field school training and meetings

For strengthening and directing the farmer movement, we focused on

  1. Farmer Cooperatives,
  2. linkage of private sector to farmers,
  3. alternative ways of slush and burn to new technologies and sustainable use of natural resources.

State/Ministries and supporting agencies should be encouraged to work with the farmers’ movement in those fields mentioned.

2. Impact of Cross sectors

This factor we focused on was the consequence and affect of one sector having bad effects on the other sectors during implementation. Those sectors are irrigation, deforestation, fisheries, etc. We should develop a policy of alternative strategies for avoiding the impact of one sector to another sector. Cross sector roles of the state farmers, NGO’s, and private sectors need to be addressed. Relationships between all sectors, impacts of one sector to another, innovative ways to solve problems, projects should be respected as to the people’s needs and our final consideration to conserve our environments.

3. Market Promotion

Food markets should be developed at local levels for local needs and food security programs implemented. The market policy price should prevent the poor from trader exploitation. Agricultural co-operative markets, food producer promotion, competitive quality and costs, and information for farmers should be made available. We should develop tax policies and exemptions for food export and agricultural equipment imports. The governments should buy products from the farmers and sell with proper policies in place. Beside the government, the farmers themselves should form their co-operative in order to buy the agricultural products of the members, store them, and then sell them at the best price to the consumer.

4. Recommendations

Improving partnerships for poverty alleviation and sustainable development by developing the policy of partnership in

  1. farmers-farmers
  2. NGO-NGO
  3. NGO-government
  4. government-government
  5. and sector-sector.

This is to be done at all levels and at all places for the purpose to solve common problems and the needs of the regions.

Facilitator: Mr. Sil Vineth, P.O.Box 472, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, sedoc@forum.org.kh.

Representatives for discussion from Lao: Mr Anonh Khamloung and Viet Nam: Mr. Dat Quorc Nguyen.

Recorder: Ann Howden, Lao P.D.R. ann_howden@hotmail.com

 

AIDS/HIV/STD

top

The objectives of the HIV/AIDS/STD Sectoral Group were:

    1. To learn from one another's experiences and insights,
    2. To discuss in depth one or more issues, such as:
      1. Integrating HIV/AIDS/STD into development
      2. Prevention beyond awareness raising
      3. Care and support (including orphans)
      4. Gender & HIV/AIDS/STD, and
    1. To develop concrete examples of partnership.

After discussing the theme and objectives of the group, the participants then spent the first session introducing themselves and their organizations, and indicating which issue/s they wished to discuss in depth. At the end of the session, the group decided to focus on "Integrating HIV/AIDS/STD into Development," and to invite some group members to give more detailed descriptions of their work on this.

At the second session, Medicins du Monde (Viet Nam) presented a video on the Condom Café at the Ho Chi Minh City Youth Cultural Hall. The work of the Condom Café focuses on HIV/AIDS/STD prevention and condom promotion among young people. One of the points made was that HIV/AIDS/STD needs to be presented as integrated in the lives of the young people.

Friends (Cambodia) and Maryknoll (Cambodia) then described their work with children infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS. This work focuses both on prevention as well as care and support. It was made clear that poverty makes the challenges of HIV/AIDS/STD harder, and that HIV/AIDS/STD itself worsens poverty, and this impacts on national social and economic development.

The last presentation was from the Khmer HIV/AIDS NGO Alliance (KHANA, Cambodia). KHANA pointed out that HIV/AIDS/STD programs are often only implemented by specialized agencies and mobilization of other resources is still limited. It was also pointed out that donors still have a limited sectoral perspective on HIV/AIDS/STD, not considering how it interacts with other development issues, such as health, education, and law enforcement. The discussion then went on to what a multi-sectoral response to HIV/AIDS/ STD means, and how such a response should be developed.

At the third and last session, the facilitators asked each participant to write responses on cards to the questions:

This process was designed to move the group from detailed discussions about only a few organizations towards a more inclusive approach, where each person could participate. The group came up with the following recommendations:

        1. Top-level commitment, policy development reflecting the integration of HIV/AIDS/STD into development at the national level, and ensuring adequate resources for HIV/AIDS/STD programs,
        2. Donor commitment and maintaining support for NGOs and others involved in the response, also recognizing the need to integrate HIV/AIDS/STD into development,
        3. Strengthening multi-sectoral responses to HIV/AIDS/STD through sharing information, collaboration in planning and implementation, among organizations and between NGOs and government. Furthermore, there should be no need to wait for top-level commitment or national policy - activities integrating HIV/AIDS/STD into development should simply be started to begin a quick response. There should be clear objectives about integrating HIV/AIDS/STD into development - what should programs do, how and to what extent?
        4. Maximizing private sector involvement in HIV/AIDS/STD responses
        5. Building capacity of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) groups.

At the end of the session, the group agreed to disseminate the participant list and this report among the group participants by e-mail.

Recorder: Mr. Choub Chamreun (Khmer HIV/AIDS NGO Alliance, Cambodia) khanapt@bigpond.com.kh

Co-facilitators: Mr. Ted Nierras (Australian Red Cross, Lao PDR)

Dr. Niramonh Chanlivong (Macfarlane Burnet Centre, Lao PDR)

 

Community Development - Rural

top

Rural Community Development how to build trust and solidarity in a stable population

N.B.: In this paper on rural development, the first page is optional.

Technical aspects discussed: Partnership in community development; trust; capacity building (training, project planning and implementation) methodologies

Resource base issues: How to improve quality of and access to education, protect the environment and improve food security.

Social problems discussed: rural exodus, youth, drugs, recruitment of young women into the sex industry; health in particular sexual and reproductive health, HIV/Aids prevention,

Food security

A. The lack of it is a major problem in rural areas, particularly in the isolated areas. There are many contributing factors; insufficient land available, there may be UXOs left over from the war; the land is not productive, there are irrigation problems; ownership is often unclear and limited to usufructus, so wealthy people can grab the land (Cambodia).

There are not enough skills to diversify and increase the production. In addition, all this is compounded by lack of support and trust within the community

B. Proven strategies

Education

A. There is a lack of awareness if the value of education. Ethnic minority children come to school and do not speak the language of instruction. Problem with the variety of languages with need interpreters High number of dropouts to seek employment or help at home. Girls are not encouraged to continue their schooling Poor facilities, lack of qualified teachers, long distances between homes and schools for small children; it is difficult to maintain schools in every village.

B. Strategies:

General:

From discussing major issues such as health, education and food security it became clear that successfully addressing any of them depends essentially on building trusting relationships of mutual understanding and a vision of what is to be achieved shared by all the stakeholders:

The case of Cambodia: After twenty years of civil war, even though the war is twenty years ago, the distrust remains. Many people are reticent to trust others and to work together in communities. There is, for that reason, a lack of interest in contributing to public works in their own communities. Without trust, however, there will be no genuine local contributions to projects, there will be no sense of ownership and the project will not be sustainable.

The case of Laos: A divisive strategy of a number of INGOs is that they pay for local in kind and in labour contributions. The Lao government cannot afford this luxury hence the practice leads to confusion about the true motivations of he community for their contributions.

The case of Viet Nam: The village people often perceive NGOs as founders, not partners. Furthermore, the funding is perceived as a charity, not as a prop for technical co-operation in a sphere of partnership. INGOs also differ greatly from one another in working style and approach. Information sharing is far from optimal. In certain regions a number of NGOS are working simultaneously, yet it is difficult to get information from local people about similar projects that are ongoing in the region.

Recommendations for building trust in rural community development

Rural development part prepared by Katie Walker. Transcribed and minimally edited by Laetitia van Haren, 22 June 2001


Community Development - Urban

top

Urban Community Development how to build solidarity and trust in a floating population

Why urban community development?

1) To help people who live in the same slum or otherwise disadvantaged neighbourhood develop a sense of community and join forces to overcome collectively encountered problems, legal, social, environmental or with their resource base.

2) To combat such problems as drug addiction and alcohol, prostitution and other forms of violence and abuse, through strengthening the community and its basic values, and to help develop more edifying alternatives

3) empower poor urban communities through access to health and education, saving schemes and informal education for adults.

4) Show the government and local authorities how poor urban neighbourhoods can be stabilised and the living conditions improved.

Obstacles to urban community development, problems encountered:

1) Insecurity of tenure, people can get evicted from one day to the other; this is both an obstacle to UCD and the reason why it is necessary

2) Different ethnic and regional origins of the population, varying dates of arrival, and also different types of legal status: residence status, job seeker, temporary visitor: all these make the building of trust and solidarity very difficult…

3) In some instances, the local authorities are too overbearing and it shies the people away from active involvement, (risk of population's withdrawal);

4) In other cases, the local authorities see the UCDP as an excuse not to help, because an NGO is already taking care of it, so the problem is solved (Risk of Gvt's withdrawal)

5) Very often, the continuity is at stake because after the three years that the project was kick- started with money from without, the local authorities do not take over the project - even if there are funds for urban poverty alleviation, because it never fits in

Observations on methodology

Urban Community participatory development is a very slow process. You have to be very patient. Many steps have to be taken and conditions fulfilled:

1) First assess the neighbourhood, to determine if they need an urban community development intervention, and what kind is feasible from the project or NGO's point of view (staff available, and funds) as well as what the local authorities accept.

2) Assess, with participation of the community, (and with local authorities in the case of Viet Nam and Laos) what the problems are: environmental sanitation, peddling/use of drugs, prostitution, violence, alcohol, unemployment, disease, children out working instead of attending school,.

3a) Sit down with the community and the government (in Laos and Viet Nam), to discuss needs and possibilities for solutions.

3b) Sit down with the community (in Thailand and Cambodia), then approach the authorities in a later stage to discuss needs and possibilities for solutions.

4) Encourage the people to designate/choose/vote a leader and spokesman. In Laos and Viet Nam, this is always someone who is also accepted by the government, and has already some formal or informal authority. In Thailand and Cambodia, it is better the community leader has no political party connections. In all three countries, the person designated is usually older and commands respect, because he has a position of local influence, he is wealthy or educated, such as a teacher. Often a man is chosen as the all - round leader (confucian heritage?). Women can be chosen, depending on the specific purpose of the group formed.

5) A special challenge is the forming of groups for savings and loan schemes. Though diversity of ethnic and geographical origin is seldom a source of conflict in most urban neighbourhoods, when something is set up that demands a lot of trust, such as a savings scheme and loan fund, people will prefer to work with close relatives or people they have known for a long time, and/or originating from same ethnic background, village or region. This makes it very hard to let newcomers participate in such projects.

6) The success of urban development groups depends to a large extent on the care with which the process was set in motion. This applies especially to savings and loan schemes.

7) Informing the urban poor about their rights and help them obtain what they are entitled to, is an important aspect of UCD. There are funds to help poor urban communities, but they are not always used in the right way, and the government lacks manpower for good implementation. Also the public needs be informed about laws and development plans and decrees that may affect them.

Success depends to a large extent on officials' capacity and goodwill:

For example, in Cambodia, the Government set up a compensation scheme for slum dwellers who live on grounds the government needs for development. Slum dwellers who are to be evicted will get compensatory land, if they can prove they are residents of such an area. But it is easy to buy an identity card of the right area from a corrupt official and then receive a plot of land. That will then be used for speculation by the buyers. In Viet Nam, the NGOs work hand in hand with the local authorities, and therefore the success of projects depends also to a great extent from the co-operation and good-will of the local authorities. In Thailand and Cambodia, the NGOs are more like middlemen brokering between the communities and the authorities and get into a form of collaboration or consultation in a later stage. In Thailand, successful interplay with capable, good-willing officials may bring subsidies and municipal support, while the NGO is still active, so the community and NGO can anticipate continuity, so the future is a lesser worry than in Viet Nam.

 

The differences between urban and rural community development are great because the conditions are really very different.

1) In rural communities, traditional groupings exist, you have to mobilise them: in urban neighbourhoods, the sense of community is often minimal and has to be built from scratch through the project intervention, with great patience.

2 The problem of access to basic services is different from that encountered in rural communities. In the rural areas, there may be no clinic and no school, and no money to go to a district hospital or school away from the village. In the slums, it is possible to send the children to school, if you can afford to keep them out of work and it is possible to get medical help, often for free for the poor, but you have to know where and how.

3) In urban neighbourhoods, families live individually but the problems are collective. In the villages, they live in communities but problems may be need for individual betterment (agricultural productivity, for instance)

 

The Link Urban-Rural Development

The real underlying issue is growing population pressure on the rural areas. The rural exodus in all three countries is alarming. In Cambodia there is no land shortage, though, whereas in Viet Nam there is. In Laos and Thailand, there is shortage of arabale land, but to a lesser degree than in Viet Nam. The problem starts with population growth, leading to pressure on the farmland, therefore fragmentation of the farms:

Population growth triggers the process:

A man has to divide up his land as his sons marry. Then the plots are so small that they can’t feed the family anymore. Also the smaller plots can be farmed by the women alone. Then the men go to the towns and cities to seek work. This they sometimes find, but sometimes not. They have little idea about the cash economy, so they can be easily cheated. They can easily lured into drinking alcohol and buying sex from prostitutes. Then the cycle has started, and no UCPDP can ever stop it.

 

Conclusion and recommendations:

1) UCD is not a panacea. It has its limits, it reaches only 10% of the slum population at the most, so it must be a model, an encouragement. It is not what pulls peasants to the city. They are pushed out by farm fragmentation, and absence of alterntives to supplement insufficient self-produced food. Comprehensive rural development is a must: what about tax incentives for investors who build their factory in the countryside instead of the city.

2) To build up sustainable urban community action, we have to make sure we develop a trusting partnership between the community, the local authorities and the NGOs. This depends on regular assessment and monitoring, clear understanding of each partner's responsibilities and the UC Development agents doing their homework about the destination plans and legal status of the slum or neighbourhood they are working with.

3) Though all UCD encountered the same comparable challenges in all countries reviewed, there are noticeable variations according to the form of government and type of economy:

4) In all countries the ultimate purpose is always the overall improvement of the slum dwellers' individual and collective living conditions.

5) In all three countries it a long slow process that requires a lot of patience: Between the day of the data collection and the identification of problems with the slum dwellers, and then the whole evolution towards a chosen committee and action, many days, months and even years will come to pass.

6) But please don’t despair, for urban community development interventions work. There is pressure on the government not to let the poor down, and as openness grows in some of the previously closed countries, successful projects that empower the urban poor have a lasting impact. They change the society. Many people who started as volunteers in urban community development have become successful businessmen or high level civil servants or politicians.

Disaster Preparedness and Relief

No Report Available

EDUCATION: PRE-SCHOOL AND PRIMARY

top

By the beginning of the second session the group had developed a framework for tackling the issues:

Using a child-centered model, four themes/issues were identified:

  1. Access (facilities, materials, teachers, community participation)
  2. Equity (gender, ethnicity, urban/rural/remote)
  3. Quality (curriculum, teacher)
  4. Relevance (curriculum, language of instruction, local/community)

It was acknowledged, or discovered, that all four themes were related. For purposes of discussion we initially divided the four related themes into two axes: Access/Equity, Quality/Relevance. However, in practice, boundaries blurred. For example, children will not go to school (access) if the curriculum is irrelevant.

Much of the first session’s discussion focused on pre-school, though it was generally agreed that this concept was too narrow and that it was more profitable to think of Early Childhood Development (ECD).

Questions of equity underpinned the entire discussion. This was because it was discovered that in all three countries ethnic minorities, particularly girls, living in rural and remote areas, had the worst access to education. This trend was more pronounced with pre-school. This raised difficult questions: education for whom? Education for what? This led to discussion about relevance. It was agreed that the most important element of relevance was a clear and specific link between education and livelihood. This raised issues of food security and health. While acknowledging that the education sector alone could not tackle these issues, it was agreed that the curriculum could play a much larger role. Two of our participants spoke of an Integrated Pest Management Program (IPM) in Primary Schools being conducted in Cambodia. This program seemed to fit well the criteria of relevance. Improving relevance for these most disadvantaged groups was considered a vital ingredient of improving quality. A second assumption was that improving quality would lead to more equitable access.

 

The following model summarizes the group’s ideas about the key ingredients of a schooling program, pre-school or primary. We singled out the teacher as the most important aspect.

 

There was some feeling that all programs should be conducted in the first language (based on what we know of children’s cognitive and linguistic development) and that donors should encourage the funding of such programs, particularly where ethnic minority girls will benefit.

Gary Ovington email: Ovington@loxinfo.co.th

Education: Secondary, Vocational

No Report available

Education: University, Graduate Work, Research, Exchanges, Distance

top

The sectoral group convened on three occasions to discuss a number of issues relating to higher education in Cambodia, Laos and Viet Nam. Upon the completion of these meetings, the participants identified several common issues and provided recommendations for the further actions on those issues. These recommendations should be understood to provide general guidelines that will have to be implemented on a country specific basis. Because higher education is essential to the creation of intellectual capital and skill building, higher education is essential in creating future leaders. , technicians, planners and those members of society necessary to alleviate poverty and sustain development in all fronts.

Below are the main issues identified by the sectoral group and recommendations for further consideration in addressing them:

Issue 1: Teacher shortage and training

  1. There should be training grants to support foreign study by teachers, Teachers must return to teach in their home countries
  2. The development of greater financial incentives to keep teachers in the education field is crucial. Likewise, teachers must be provided with continuing education and incentive to actively participate in it.

Issue 2: Teaching methods:

  1. Training workshops inviting senior, experiences lectures as well as foreign lecturers should be developed to promote greater exchange of teaching methodologies.
  2. Greater linkages for faculty exchange or an international level

Issue 3:Research

  1. Development of an ongoing campus science center using technology and professional exchange
  2. Research should focus on and relate to material taught in class and in the student’s are of study.
  3. Government industry and universities should develop incentives to promote faculty development through research. In time, it is hoped that this will also be linked to the development of a system of meritocracy
  4. NGO internships
  5. Research should expend beyond math and science to social areas to provide support and growth to society at large

Issue 4: International Cooperation

  1. Local and foreign universities should focus on their abilities and talent to locate areas of mutual benefit. This should create lasting and more stable relationships
  2. Development of joint research projects
  3. Development of greater foreign language facility to support educational exchange internationally
  4. Earlier and closer cooperation between local and foreign universities to plan projects and obtain funding

Issue 5: Increasing educational access:

  1. Develop policies to promote completion of primary and secondary level eduation by women. Over time this will increase potential access to higher educatuion
  2. Develop policies to promote greater merit based access
  3. Clearer policies between government and universities regarding student costs, tuition , admission (Cambodia)
  4. Expansion of the number of private institutions
  5. Development of policies to make education more affordable (student loans, scholarships)

Issue 6: Standards and Quality of Education

  1. The term ‘quality’ education should be defined within each country. What are the criteria for such an education?
  2. Develop instruments to measure educational achievement
  3. Develop a system of accreditation to insure a uniform level of education. Such a system must apply equally to both public and private institutions
  4. Development of credit transfer system

Item 7: Investment in higher education

  1. There should be a fundamental investment in higher education as the products of that education form the intellectual capital of society. Such investment should not detract from investment in the primary and secondary levels
  2. Development of loans and scholarships (see issue 5 generally)

Item 8: Relevance of Education

  1. Universities should be responsive to the needs of their students, local communities and the nation in general
  2. There should be some system to evaluate the results of student educational experience, i.e. to measure the results of educational outputs.

Environment, Ecology Restoration

No Report available

Health: Primary Health Care and Reproductive Health

top

The group consisted of over 22 people of diverse backgrounds. Participants were from all three countries representing government officials, mass organizations, NGOs, international organizations and educational services. Four topics were chosen to focus discussion:

  1. Community Health services integration
  2. Community development
  3. Sustainability/budget
  4. Coordination collaboration across borders

The larger group broke into two smaller groups with each group discussing two topics. Discussion followed the group feedback with the following conclusions:

Observations

Recommendations

Suggestions/lessons learned

  • PHC was at various stages of implementation across the three counties
  • Population densities of the three countries caused problems in implementing PHC
  • Commitment of Village workers was good and important to successful health care. Village level people are very willing.
  • Village commitment better than urban
  • Very difficult to get urban people to stay and work in remote or village level
  • Poor management of the workers in PHC
  • At the present PHC approach is too top down, needs to be more bottom up approach
  • Difficult to implement PHC without skilled, knowledgeable human resource
  • Poor quality of services and lack of awareness of concept of PHC
  • Ownership of program very important
  • NGO/partners need better understanding between them
  • Pool resources
  • Mass organizations need to be involved at all levels
  • IEC ‘skills’ are needed by all PHC workers
  • Capacity building in all PHC skills at all levels but especially the community
  • Health workers should be facilitators to the community level
  • Advocacy is very important
  • Funding needs to be sustainable
  • Collaboration of sectors at all levels
  • Integration of all stakeholders ate community, district and provincial level is important for PHC work
  • Ensure health staff are appropriate in terms of knowledge of local culture and language
  • Collaboration and coordination and planning between international organizations, NGOs and the national program
  • Need to do strategy planning with all the stakeholders from the beginning and at the community level
  • Identifying and taking account of population characteristics for strategic plan development
  • A strategy for transfer of the project/program needs to be considered by all parties during the planning of the project
  • Models and studies to be reviewed so project is sustainable
  • Funding issues need to be resolved
  • Training of ‘local’ and ethnic minority people to work in own area
  • Supply of equipment/supplies/kits needs to be secure
  • Need to establish links/committees at the community level
  • Need to meet the local needs of the trainees. (Training needs assessment before they are trained)
  • Need to be thinking of training social workers for the future
  • We need to learn to listen to the community
  • Need to build capacity/awareness of communities to mobilize resources and to demand government health care services
  • Government forum for all stakeholders to share and exchange information
  • Possible need for motivation incentives
  • Regular meeting to share information on activities and progress for all stakeholders
  • Regular monitoring of progress
  • Prepared by Nancy Miekle, Health Unlimited – Lao PDR Email: huphclao@laonet.net

     

    Labor, Working conditions

    top

    Discussion Topics:

    1. Labor Situation
    2. Labor Law Enforcement & Inspection
    3. Labor Issues, Garment Industry
    4. Labor Policy
    5. Minimum Wage
    6. Living Wage

    Conclusions:

    Recommendations

    Send and receive information

    international networking for employers, consumers, organizations, governments, NGOs, trade unions, etc.

    advocate for better work conditions, salaries

    employment opportunities

    build up training centers, labor, employment service centers

    Employment data by sector

    Unemployment data

    In and out migration data

    Price data


    Land: Pressures of Population and Legal Issues

    No Report Available


    Legacies: Land mines, UXO, Agent Orange

    top

    Participants in the sectoral group on landmines, UXOs and Agent Orange aware of the devastating effects of these legacies of war in Viet Nam, Laos and Cambodia and of the enormous task of clearing and rehabilitating affected land, communities and disabled individuals faxing the governments and people of these countries recommend

    With particular reference to Agent Orange we

    Denise Coghlan, LWS – Cambodia, Facilitator

     


    Micro-credit, Economic Development

    No report available

     


    Nutrition and Child Survival

    top

    I-Observation

    There were seven participants in the nutrition working group. Three persons are from Laos, one from Viet Nam and two from Cambodia.

    Nutrition is the critical problem of the three countries. The causes of the nutrition problem are:

    Present situation of children in the three countries is:

    . IMR 89 per 1,000 live births, MMR 473 per 100,000 for Cambodia,

    . IMR 82 per 1,000 live births, MMR 530 per 100,000 for Laos and

    . IMR 40 per 1,000 live births, MMR 130 per 100,000 for Viet Nam)

    Policy: each country has National Policy on Poverty Reduction

    Strategy:

    Measures/Approach

    II- Conclusion

    There are great challenges for the three countries to tackle the nutritional problems. These are as following:

    III-Recommendation

    The following recommendations are set up:

    1. National policy on nutrition and concrete plan of action should be developed (Laos).
    2. Government and international community should put more attention and assistance on nutrition.
    3. Promotion of strong KAP among stakeholders and population at large.

    Private Investment, Trade and Tourism

    top

    Representatives from the Lao PDR Ministry of Commerce, the Lao PDR National Tourism Authority, Planet Computers, Arizona State University, University of Los Angeles, Orbis International, Educate Laos, UN Volunteers, Save the Children, and Oxfam America participated in the sectoral group discussions.

    The Lao PDR adopted new economic policies in 1986 and since that time it has both expanded its commercial relations with foreign countries as well as promoted private investment in economic sectors that encourage production of goods for export. The Lao PDR also has widened trade relations with neighboring countries in an effort to expand export markets. The main exports at present include wood and wood products, electricity, agricultural products including coffee, tea and minerals, garmets and handicrafts. In this particular context, the passage of Normal Trade Relations by the U.S. Congress would greatly help promote trade between the Lao PDR and the U.S.

    In addition to promoting responsible private investment in export oriented commodities, the Lao PDR has also identified the tourism sector as another investment opportunity. The Lao PDR National Tourism Authority has prioritized the development of tourism along two lines: Eco-Tourism and Cultural Tourism. The theme aim to promote the natural scenic beauty of Laos as well as promote the rich culturally diversity of the country. The value of the experience is seen as the key element to promoting tourism. In this context, the aim is clearly not to promote mass tourism but to channel tourism along the two prioritized themes. Such tourism anticipates generating local jobs as well as promoting understanding about the country.

    The principal constraint associated with promoting tourism is the weak physical infrastructure of the country such as roads, transportation networks and communications and accommodations. Other limitations also exist which limit the expansion of the this economic sector including local working capital.

    Process of Developing Funding Proposals

    top

    In addressing this very large and broad topic, the sectoral group first reviewed the various steps of the project cycle, from project identification through appraisal, negotiation, and approval to implementation and post facto evaluation.

    The sectoral group then broke into four smaller groups to consider the strengths, weaknesses, and problems encountered by governments, local NGOs, international NGOs, and funding agencies (including international NGOs) in developing good funding proposals. The results of these discussions, which were reviewed by the whole sectoral group, are summarized in the following table:

     

     

    STRENGTHS OR COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES

     

    WEAKNESSES

    PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED, AREAS OF CONCERN

    GOVERNMENTS

    • Should be in the "driver’s seat" given overall responsibility for national development
    • In best position to know/determine national development priorities

     

     

    • Insufficient capacity, weak donor coordination mechanisms
    • Can be beholden to donor priorities and development agendas
    • Corruption issues, lack of transparency
    • Need for improved project approval and project reporting mechanisms

    LOCAL NGOs

    • Includes wide range of civil society actors (local NGOs, mass organizations, socio-professional organizations, interest groups, etc.)
    • Independence, diversity, flexibility
    • Excellent knowledge of local needs and resources, "with the people"
    • Human resource capacity remains limited
    • Extremely limited financial resources
    • Unclear status vis-à-vis governments
    • Often excluded from government programming
    • Insecure funding base, difficult to plan without longer-term guarantee of financial resources
    • Governments often suspicious of local NGOs
    • Lack of comprehensive NGO laws and registration procedures, etc.

    INTERNATIONAL NGOs

    • Solid international experience in many sectors, including disaster relief, provision of basic services, community organization, training and technical assistance, research and information exchange, networking, development education, advocacy, etc.
    • Credibility and "name brand", solid commitment to sustainable development and pro-poor development
    • Ability to mentor and support local or community-based groups
    • Willingness to experiment and take developmental risks
    • Can serve as "watch dog" for both Governments and funding agencies
    • Sometimes limited capacity for complex projects
    • Sometimes limited capacity to scale-up successful development initiatives
    • Often short project cycles, including funding uncertainties
    • Can be dogmatic, or more interested in "progressive" advocacy/rhetoric than on-the-ground development
    • Continued uncertainty re: longer-term funding
    • Unclear government registration procedures and coordination mechanisms
    • Visa approvals
    • Access to senior government decision-makers (sometimes)

    FUNDING AGENCIES

    • $$$$
    • Knowledge, best practices, technical resources and skills
    • Claim a clear development vision (i.e. know what want to accomplish)
    • Part of established development networks (e.g. partnerships with other donors)
    • Can command attention of governments (policy dialogue, conditionality)
    • Arrogance and insensitivity (sometimes)
    • May not know real, "on the ground" situation (i.e. too HQ bound)
    • Inflexible programming timeframes and procedures and overly complicated funding requirements
    • Fickle development agendas including lack of long-term commitment to longer-term development processes
    • Funding cycles, no longer-term guarantee of financial resources for specific development activities
    • Increased competition for scarce development resources

     

    A final working session was devoted to policy and other recommendations, as follows:

    Governments

    Mass Organizations and Local NGOs

    International NGOs

    Funding Agencies

    Other Recommendations

     


    Services for and with People with Disabilities

    top

    Weaknesses:

    --CDPO, HI, AmCross, provide counseling, other activities include database collection, education for children with disabilities, for blind & deaf, disability awareness raising.

    ----

    Causes of disabilities:

    Primary Issues and Solutions:

    Recommendations:

    1. Active involvement of people with disabilities in all activities
    2. Government Commitment
    3. Raise fundraising capacity
    4. Cooperation between three countries & the region & internationally, especially in information and experience sharing, study visits, workshops, seminars and association exchanges.

    Social and Economic Development in Remote Areas

    No report available

    Trafficking of Women and Children

    top

    General Comments:

    General Recommendations:

    Child Trafficking

    Migration, Repatriation, and Reintegration

    Comments:

    Recommendations:

    The group had 40 members. Facilitator: Janet Ashby jashby@gmx.net Reporter: Jennifer Cameron jenc@laotel.com

     


    Women's Organizations and Priorities

    top

     

    Agenda:

    1. Equality across Gender
    2. Ethnic Minority Women
    3. Women and access to Education
    4. Issues in developing women’s organizations
    5. Roles of women in economic development

    Recommendations and Priorities